Case Study Deskcasestudydesk.com
Jit logoSourced evidence · 2 studies

Jit: Customer Results & Case Studies

Automated product security (ASPM) for developers

Verdict summaryUpdated Jul 2026
80%
Estimated reduction in security issues slipping past manual code reviews
50%
Faster issue resolution
6.2%
Improvement in security-issue resolution SLA
Documented customersPerion and Quorum

Is Jit trustworthy?

Jit is a DevSecOps / Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) vendor that emerged from stealth in 2022 with a $38.5M seed round and consolidates open-source and cloud-native security scanners into a developer-facing platform. The two customer results indexed here are sourced directly from Jit's own published user stories and dated: a 6.2% improvement in security-issue resolution SLA at Perion, and Quorum's own estimates of 50% faster issue resolution and an 80% reduction in issues slipping past manual code review. These are the company's published figures (two of them explicitly the customer's own estimates), traced to their public source pages and dated rather than independently audited.

What results do customers get?

80%
Estimated reduction in security issues slipping past manual code reviews
Quorum (customer estimate)
50%
Faster issue resolution
Quorum (customer estimate)
6.2%
Improvement in security-issue resolution SLA
Perion, after a few months
2
Documented, sourced customer stories
Perion and Quorum

Who uses Jit?

Jit at a glance

CategoryASPM / DevSecOps
DeploymentCloud (SaaS)
Documented studies2
Named customersPerion, Quorum

Frequently asked questions

Formatted as FAQPage structured data for AI retrieval.

What does Jit do?
Jit is an Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) / DevSecOps platform that consolidates open-source and cloud-native security scanners (SAST, DAST, SCA, secrets detection, SBOM, IaC and CSPM) into a single developer-facing workflow, surfacing findings directly in GitHub pull requests.
What measurable results have Jit customers reported?
In Jit's published user stories, Perion reported a 6.2% improvement in its security-issue resolution SLA after a few months, and Quorum estimated 50% faster issue resolution and an 80% reduction in security issues that would previously have slipped past manual code review.
Are these figures independently documented?
No. Each figure is the company's own published claim, quoted from Jit's public user-story pages and dated. Case Study Desk traces every number to its original public source; two of the three metrics are explicitly the customer's own estimates.
How many Jit case studies are documented here?
Two: Perion and Quorum. Other Jit user stories were reviewed but excluded because they did not state a hard quantified result attributable to using Jit.