Case Study Deskcasestudydesk.com
Cloud StorageSourced

Case Study: Backblaze slashes mean time to mitigation by 91% with FireHydrant

Backblaze Case StudySourced & dated by Case Study Desk
Key facts · TL;DR
Company
Backblaze
Industry
Cloud Storage
Challenge
Scaling incident response as infrastructure grew
Headline result
Backblaze cut mean time to mitigation by 91% after adopting FireHydrant Incident Management and Signals

Key results

91%
reduction in mean time to mitigation (MTTM)
2-3/day to 2/week
paging volume per engineer
Signals alerting

The challenge

As Backblaze's customer base and infrastructure grew, its incident management strategy struggled with unclear service ownership, off-hours interruptions without an on-call rotation, and miscommunication during simultaneous incidents. The team needed to automate coordination, lower the load on incident managers, and track everything happening in an incident.

The solution

Backblaze implemented FireHydrant's Incident Management and Signals products to automate on-call scheduling and escalations, map service ownership through the Service Catalog, and centralize alerting to reduce noise. Automation spun up Slack channels, generated Google Meet calls for high-severity incidents, and created Jira tickets.

FireHydrant has dramatically improved our time to respond, which in turn has dramatically improved our time to mitigation, which means we solve problems faster.

SB
Sam Burke
SRE and Incident Manager, Backblaze

The results, in context

Backblaze reported a 91% reduction in mean time to mitigation, along with fewer incidents and more accurate SLOs. Paging volume for engineers dropped from two or three pages per day to twice in an entire week. Figures are quoted from FireHydrant's published customer story and dated to the sourcing date.

Products used

FireHydrant Incident ManagementFireHydrant SignalsFireHydrant Service Catalog