Case Study Deskcasestudydesk.com
Industrial AutomationSourced

Case Study: Festo cuts ML experiment setup from 8 hours to 20-30 minutes with Weights & Biases

Festo Case StudySourced & dated by Case Study Desk
Key facts · TL;DR
Company
Festo
Industry
Industrial Automation
Challenge
Slow, manual ML experiment setup
Headline result
Experiment setup: 8 hours to 20-30 minutes

Key results

20-30 min
Experiment setup time
Down from an average of 8 hours

The challenge

Festo developed machine-learning models that detect pneumatic cylinder leaks from audio signals to predict equipment failures before they cause downtime. Setting up and tuning each new experiment with new data was slow and manual.

The solution

Festo used Weights & Biases experiment tracking to record hyperparameters and metrics automatically, Sweeps for hyperparameter optimization, and Launch for distributed training across GPU machines.

W&B has saved us so much time and effort by streamlining our workflow and making it easy to compare experiments side-by-side and see the impact of different approaches on our results.

DS
Daniel Spies
Machine Learning Engineer, Festo

The results, in context

Festo reduced the time to set up a new experiment from an average of eight hours to twenty to thirty minutes, including Keras callback and plot logging.

Products used

Weights & Biases W&B Experiment TrackingWeights & Biases W&B SweepsWeights & Biases W&B Launch