Case Study Deskcasestudydesk.com
Customer Experience ManagementSourced

Case Study: Sprinklr cuts retrieval infrastructure cost 30% with Qdrant

Sprinklr Case StudySourced & dated by Case Study Desk
Key facts · TL;DR
Company
Sprinklr
Industry
Customer Experience Management
Challenge
Scalable, low-latency retrieval for AI
Headline result
30% lower retrieval infrastructure cost

Key results

30%
Reduction in retrieval infrastructure cost
Internal benchmarking
20ms
P99 latency on 1M-vector search
vs. >100ms for Elasticsearch and Milvus
250 RPS
Throughput under load
vs. ~100 RPS for Elasticsearch
<10%
Of Elasticsearch's indexing time
100k–1M vector incremental indexing

The challenge

Sprinklr, a leader in unified customer experience management, engages global brands across more than 30 digital channels and needed a scalable vector database to power AI-driven search for RAG applications, FAQ bots, and customer-interaction analysis. Its team ran a comprehensive evaluation to benchmark speed, cost, and developer experience.

The solution

After evaluating Pinecone, Weaviate, and Elasticsearch, Sprinklr adopted Qdrant, starting with 10% of its workloads before scaling up. Quantization and memory-mapping features let the team reduce RAM usage for further cost savings.

Retrieval is the foundation of all our AI tasks, and Qdrant's resilience and speed have made it an integral part of our system.

RS
Raghav Sonavane
Associate Director of Machine Learning Engineering, Sprinklr

The results, in context

Internal benchmarking showed Qdrant reduced Sprinklr's retrieval infrastructure cost by 30%. In Sprinklr's benchmarks Qdrant delivered a P99 latency of 20ms on 1 million-vector searches, handled up to 250 requests per second versus roughly 100 RPS for Elasticsearch, and required less than 10% of Elasticsearch's incremental indexing time for 100k–1M vectors.

Products used

Qdrant Qdrant Vector Database