Case Study Deskcasestudydesk.com
Personal InjurySourced

Case Study: Levinson & Stefani cuts manual intake 75% with Lawmatics

Levinson & Stefani Case StudySourced & dated by Case Study Desk
Key facts · TL;DR
Company
Levinson & Stefani
Industry
Personal Injury
Challenge
Manual intake could not scale non-referral case growth
Headline result
75% reduction in manual intake tasks

Key results

75%
Reduction in manual intake tasks
80%
Of intake process now automated
2x
Growth in non-referral case volume

The challenge

Levinson & Stefani, a Chicago personal injury firm handling auto and trucking cases, relied on manual steps to respond to new leads. The firm wanted immediate, consistent responses without depending on someone remembering to act.

The solution

The firm automated its intake process with Lawmatics so that responses fire consistently, bringing the majority of intake under automation and using data to guide changes.

We've nearly doubled the number of cases coming from non-referral sources and we've been able to handle that growth without adding intake staff.

JS
Jay Stefani
Managing Partner, Levinson & Stefani

The results, in context

Lawmatics reports a 75% reduction in manual intake tasks, with 80% of the intake process now automated. The firm also documents 2x growth in non-referral case volume handled without adding intake staff.

Products used

Lawmatics Lawmatics